Get Permission Razi, Singh, Krishna, Zarrin, and Qamar: Piezoelectric surgery - Gaining popularity in modern periodontics: A review


Introduction

Periodontal diseases are multifactorial infections caused by many bacterial species that interact with host tissues and cells, leading to the extensive release of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and mediators, which destroys the periodontal structures, including teeth supporting bone, leading to bony deformities.1 This alteration in the normal physiologic bone pattern are corrected by various periodontal regenerative and reconstructive procedures.1 Deformities in bone are corrected by osseous surgery for re-contouring the bone patterns. For many decades osseous surgery ware conventionally performed using hand and various rotary instruments. Using these conventional instruments, inappropriate force and heat generation during osseous surgery leads to fracture of the brittle bone, ultimately leading to alteration in standard physiologic bone patterns.2, 3 In the recent past, innovative surgical techniques using piezoelectric device machines with regulated frequency, restrained tip vibration has been introduced in Periodontology and Oral Implantology assuring precise and productive methods in comparison to the conventional technique. It has gained popularity in very short duration due to wide variety of applications in both medical and dental surgeries. It has made the surgical procedures like bone incising (osteotomy) and bone shaping (osteoplasty) easier.4

Historical Aspects and Physics Involved in Piezosurgery

The word ‘’Piezo’’ originates from the greek word Piezein (to press tight, squeeze). Piezosurgery is basically based on the theory of "piezo-effect" i.e., changing the electrical field on crystalline structure.

The change of electrical field strength in the crystalline structure results in the production of ultrasonic vibrations. In 1880, Jacques Curie and Pierre Curie discovered piezoelectric while working as laboratory assistants at the faculty of science in Paris. They generated electrical charges by applying pressure to the crystals like tourmaline, quartz and Rochelle salts.4, 5 In 1881, Gabriel Lippmann predicted the converse piezoelectric effect i.e. application of an electric field to the crystal materials causes the internal generation of a mechanical strain with the help of mathematical deduction from thermodynamic principles. In 1953, Catuna MC developed a drill with ultrasonic properties for cavity preparation on human teeth.6 In 1957, Richman reported apicoectomies using an ultrasonic chisel for surgery without using slurry.7 Demonstration to dissect the bone precisely using an ultrasonic blade was given by Mazzarow in 1960.8 Mcfall et al., in 1961 compared healing with rotating instruments and an oscillating scalpel blade and concluded that there was no severe complications and wound healing was comparatively slower in the oscillating scalpel blade group.9

In 1980, Horton et al., conducted a study on alveolar bone in dogs comparing bone regeneration with rotating instruments and ultrasounds and concluded that regeneration of bone was better in ultrasonic group as compared to rotating instrument group, however smoother surface was appeared in rotating instrument group.3 Torella et al., in 1998 reported the osteotomy procedures to lift the maxillary sinus was done by ultrasonic piezoelectric instruments.10 Vercelloti T, in 1999, in collaboration with Mectron Spa invented piezoelectric bone surgery. Vercelloti T in 2000, published the first human clinical study using "piezoelectric bone surgery" maintaining the integrity of bone.7, 11 In 2001, after bringing together (ultrasound and the piezo effect), the Piezo­surgery® was introduced as a surgical tool.8 This device was commercially approved in Germany in the year 2002.4 In 2003, Vercelloti fabricated the optimal frequency methods for performing surgical procedures.12, 13 In 2005, ultrasonics in the field of dentistry to perform different bone surgery was continued by the US Food and Drug Administration.14

Ideology of Piezoelectric Surgery

The doctrine behind the piezoelectric bone surgery is mostly based on two underlying concepts: 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Minimally invasive surgery

Improving the tissue healing and reducing the discomfort among patients; post-operative pain or swelling is much lower than the traditional technique.

Surgical predictability

Increases treatment effectiveness and ease of using the instrument during the surgery. Minor bleeding, accuracy in cutting, and magnificent tissue healing make it best to enhance surgical results despite being used in the most complex anatomical cases. The piezoelectric device produces ultrasonic vibration (25-29KHz frequency), an oscillation (60-120µm), and power up to 50W. This allows an adequate cutting of bone without damaging the soft tissue. 4 Applying electrical charges to the face of piezoelectric crystals result in crystal compression. In contrast, inverting the direction of electric charge results in expansion. When piezoelectric crystals like quartz or ceramic disk are placed under an alternating electric field, there is compression and expansion of the crystal, which produces a series of vibrations. 20

These vibrations result in an oscillating shape change of the crystal at the frequency applied, which finally passes onto the working tip, also called inserts, where longitudinal movement occurs, resulting in the cutting of osseous tissue by the microscopic shattering of bone. 21 When this series of vibrations are conducted through a piezoelectric transducer, higher efficiency is obtained. The device uses a specifically engineered surgical instrument characterised by a surgical power that is three times higher than usual ultrasonic instruments. The piezoelectric device can be adjusted over various working frequency setting to perform different procedures. The ultrasonic waves allow the segregation of interface from solid-liquid through micro boiling phenomena called cavitation. This phenomenon occurs by implosion of the droplets causing release of energy as the water spray contacts. 22 This provides advantage in the surgical area by dispersing coolant as an aerosol, provide hemostasis resulting in the clear visibility in the surgical area. Cavitation also fragments bacterial cell walls. 23, 24, 25

Components of Piezosurgery unit

Composed of

Main body

Main body is composed of touchpad (electronic), display screen, a peristaltic pump, a stand to hold the surgical handpiece,one stand to hold the bag of irrigation and different modes (roots and bone).

Handle

Piezoelectric ceramic discs inside handle generates ultrasonic waves.

Inserts tips

  1. Based on the colour of tips 4, 22, 26

    1. Steel tips: For soft tissues or delicate structures, e.g. root of the teeth.

    2. Gold tips: Used to treat bone. Titanium nitride is applied to increase the tips surface hardness.

  2. Morphological-functional classification 27The morphology represents the structural properties of the tips, while the functional description exemplify the cutting characteristics of the inserts:

    1. Sharp- Cutting

    2. Diamond coated - Abrasive

    3. Rounded - Smoothing

  3. Clinical classification (According to basic surgical technique).27

Table 0

Osteotomy (OT) OT1 - OT2- OT3- OT 4- OT5- OT6- OT7- OT7S4 - OT7S3- OT8R/L

Osteoplasty (OP) OP1 - OP2- OP3- OP4- OP5- OP6- OP7

Extraction (EX) EX1 - EX2 - EX3

Implant site preparation (IM) IM1 (OPs)- IM2A- IM2P- OT 4- IM3A- IM3P

Orthodontic Microsurgery OT7S4- OT7S3

Sinus Lift OP3- OT1 (OPs)- EL1 - EL2- EL3

Implant site preparation (IM) IM1 (OPs)- IM2A- IM2P- OT 4- IM3A- IM3P

Periodontal Surgery PS2 - OP5 - OP3 - OP3A- PP1

Endodontic Surgery OP3- PS2- EN1 - EN2- OP7

Ridge Expansion OT7- OT7S4- OP5 (IM1)- IM2- OT 4- IM3

Figure 1

Clinical characteristics of Piezosurgery cutting activity (Figure 1)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/319fd98d-e64b-4c78-999c-623604ce3b16image1.png

Clinical applications

  1. Periodontology

    1. Supragingival and subgingival scaling:

    2. Curettage.

    3. Crown lengthening.

    4. Resective surgery.

    5. Bone harvest.

  2. Implantology

    1. Maxillary sinus lift

    2. Ridge expansion

    3. Inferior alveolar nerve laterization

    4. Bone harvesting techniques

    5. Perimucositis, periimplantitis, implant drill

    6. Implant removal

  3. Oral surgery

    1. Dental extraction, including third molar extraction

    2. Osteogenic distraction

    3. Cyst removal

    4. Endodontic surgery (apicoectomy)

    5. Extraction of ankylosed teeth

    6. TMJ ankylosis treatment

  4. Orthodontic surgery- In Vilcodontics, PAOO (Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics).

Movement occurs and in that different width and depth of osteotomy has to be performed. (corticotomy).

Scaling (supra gingival and sub-gingival) and Curettage

The piezosurgery device with a vibrating tip is used for removing the debris and calculus from the teeth. Inserts are placed vertically parallel to the tooth's long axis and are moved continuously, providing better patient comfort and maximum calculus removal. The cavitation effect and micro-streaming disrupt the bacterial cell wall. 28 It can also efficiently remove diseased soft tissue by debridement of the pocket wall's epithelial lining, resulting in "micro-cauterisation" by using thin tapered tips and altered power settings. 29

Surgical crown lengthening

This procedure is done to reposition the periodontal bone and soft tissues to a more apical position with appropriate biologic dimensions. Performing this technique using piezosurgery allows clinicians to efficiently reduce bone while preserving the root surface integrity. Ostectomy is performed while keeping the instruments parallel to the root, and there is no risk of damaging the root. Once the Osteotomy is completed, smoothing is performed parallel to the root surface and the bony micro-spicules are removed with the tip of the inserts. 30

Maxillary sinus lifting

Maxillary sinus surgery for implant purposes enables the placement of an implant in the posterior maxilla when the crest of the bone is not sufficient. During conventional sinus lift procedures most common obstacle faced by clinician is the perforation of the Schneiderian membrane that leads to a communication between the oral cavity and maxillary sinus. This perforation increases the risk of sinusitis and infections. 31 Introduction of Piezosurgery in the maxillary sinus lift procedure abate the risk of Schneiderian membrane as the tips only cuts the mineralized tissues without damaging the soft tissue. 32 Maxillary sinus lift procedure using piezoelectric surgery shows approximately only 5% of membrane perforation, 33 whereas with rotary instrumentation varies between 5% and 56%.34, 35

Ridge Expansion Technique

The minimum width of an edentulous crest for placing a 4 mm diameter implant is 6 mm to obtain at least 1mm width of the buccal and lingual bone side. Narrow ridges are most frequently experienced by the clinician during placement of the dental implants. To overcome this, the ridge is expanded or splitted for expanding the bone to ease implant placement. 36 The ridge splitting of the mandible can also be done using conventional instruments but the risk of bone fracture as well as inferior alveolar damage is very high.37, 38 To achieve ridge expansion with very less trauma the Piezosurgery unit is equipped with specific designed inserts that provides minimal fracture risk even in D1 type bone, where the chance of fracture is more. 38, 39, 40

Harvesting autogenous bone graft

Autogenous bone graft is considered the “gold standard” for bone grafting procedures. Autogenous bone graft can be harvested as particulate or as a block grafts. Autogenous bone grafts are most commonly harvested from the ramus and body of the mandible, chin, symphysis, mandibular tori (if present) which shows good osteogenic properties, little resorption. Iliac crest, is considered for harvesting larger bone volumes. 36 The introduction of piezosurgery has further improvised the bone harvesting technique. Bone graft harvesting using a piezoelectric device showed greater short-term cell viability and slightly more new bone deposition and bone remodelling.41 Piezosurgery utilises significantly less hand pressure than rotary instruments; hence precise cutting of bone is easily possible. 42, 43

Inferior alveolar nerves lateralisation

In regions with significantly less visibility, performing the osteotomies with a tool that reduces the risk of nerve damage is essential. This goal can be possible with the Piezosurgery device due to its control, specialised tips and cavitation effect. 44 The specially designed tips of piezoelectric device precisely cuts allowing the lateral cortical bone over the neurovascular bundle. This procedure is performed to preserve and protect the nerve structure after nerve retraction and transposition. 45

Removal of osseointegrated implants

Removal of an osseointegrated implant becomes utmost necessary for various reasons, including the undesirable position or primary esthetic concern, implant failures etc.

The osseointegrated implants (implant-bone interface) do not allow easy implant removal. Removal of such implants by conventional methods such as using burs, saw, chisel etc., have high risk of fracturing bone around the implants. The piezosurgical device have specially designed précised tips to remove osseointegrated implants. It makes easier for the surgeon as it improves efficacy and reduces trauma during the procedure.36

Contraindications of piezosurgery

  1. Uncontrolled diabetic patients.

  2. Patients with cardiopathy

  3. Patients with pacemakers & ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator)

  4. On metal and ceramic crown and bridges.

Discussion

Piezosurgery is a new surgical technique in periodontology and oral implantology.26 Piezosurgery instruments allow the clinician to perform more technique sensitive procedures which enabled better grip and, hence, increased precision while cutting. The cutting action is less invasive, leading very less collateral tissue damage.27 Cavitation effect produced as the oscillating tip moves the irrigation fluid, there is a bloodless field of surgery and also fewer chances of postoperative necrosis. Due to the ultrasonic device's aerosol effect, hazard of developing subcutaneous emphysema is drastically reduced as compared to air-water spray released by rotary instruments for osteotomies. 

Due to micro-vibrations, significantly less noise is produced when compared with a conventional motor system making less fear and reduces psychological stress among the patients. 28 Use of rotary instruments lead to high heat generations which are lethal to the cells and may cause tissue necrosis. 27 There have been many studies conducted for analysing the effects of piezoelectric surgery on the bone and the bone cells; not only is this piezoelectric technique is clinically effective, but histological and histo-morphometric observation on experimental animal models also indicated that postoperative wound healing and rate of bone formation and tissue response is more favourable compared to conventional bone cutting with diamond or carbide rotary instruments. 26, 29 Every coin has two sides. Piezosurgery is also associated with certain limitations. The use of irrigants helps in cavitation and avoids overheating. The intensity of the cooling liquid can be adjusted depending on different preparations. The cooling solution is used at 4 degrees centigrade. 30

Conclusions

The Piezosurgery technique has numerous advantages over conventional surgical procedures. This technique allows the clinician to perform planned surgery in more efficient and predictable manner with minimum adverse effect. The use of Piezosurgery may increase treatment outcome, very less postoperative complications and an excellent healing. Piezosurgery due to specially designed tips and other properties has the future to revolutionize periodontal bone surgeries, implantology and redefine the concept of minimally invasive surgery in osteotomy and osteoplasty procedures. However, professional training and experienced guidance is required to achieve a better clinical skill enhancement.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

SC Holt JL Ebersole Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia: the "red complex", a prototype polybacterial pathogenic consortium in periodontitisPeriodontol 20002005387212210.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00113.x

2 

A Rashad A Kaiser N Prochnow I Schmitz E Hoffmann P Haurer Heat Production during different Ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparation for dental ImplantsClin Oral Implants Res2011221213615

3 

JE Horton TM Tarpley LD Wood The healing of surgical defects in alveolar bone produced with ultrasonic instrumentation, chisel, and rotary burOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol197539453646

4 

M Thomas U Akula KK Ealla N Gajjada Piezosurgery: A boon for modern periodonticsJ Int Soc Prev Community Dent20177117

5 

M Labanca F Azzola R Vinci LF Rodella Piezoelectric surgery: Twenty years of useBr J Oral Maxillofac Surg20084642659

6 

MC Catuna Sonic SurgeryAnn Dent19531210029

7 

MJ Richman The use of ultrasonics in root canal therapy and root resectionMed Dent J195712128

8 

HB Mazarow Bone repair after experimentally produced defectsJ Oral Surg19601810715

9 

TA Mcfall GM Yamane GW Burnett Comparison of cutting effect on bone of ultrasonic cutting device and rotary bursJ Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv1961192009

10 

F Torrella J Pitarch G Cabanes E Aniuta Ultrasonic osteotomy for surgical approach of maxillary sinus: A technical noteInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants1998135697700

11 

T Vercellotti Piezoelectric surgery in implantology: a case report--a new piezoelectric ridge expansion techniqueInt J Periodontics Restorative Dent200020435965

12 

LJ Walsh Piezosurgery: An increasing role in dental hard tissue surgeryAust Dent Pract2007185526

13 

CC Pereira WC Gealh L Meorin-Nogueira IR Garcia-Júnior R Okamoto Piezosurgery applied to implant dentistry: clinical and biological aspectsJ Oral Implantol201440401810.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00196

14 

J Thomas piezoelectric ultrasonic bone surgery: Benefits for the interdisciplinary team and patientsDent India200823204

15 

LT Boioli T Vercellotti JF Tecucianu La chirurgie piezoelectrique: Une alternative aux techniques classiques de chirurgie osseuselnf Dent 20048641288793

16 

JT Lambrecht Intraoral piezo-surgerySchweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed200411412936

17 

S Sivolella M Berengo M Scarin F Mella F Martinelli Autogenous particulate bone collected with a piezoelectric surgical device and bone trap: a microbiological and histomorphometric studyArch Oral Biol2006511088391

18 

T Vercellotti La Chirurgia Ossea Piezoelettrica ll Dentista Moderno200352155

19 

T Vercellotti Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgeryMinerva Stomatal200453520714

20 

Z Yaman BT Suer Piezoelectric surgery in oral and maxillofacial surgeryAnn Oral Maxillofac Surg20131119

21 

P Leclercq C Zenati S Amr DM Dohan Ultrasonic bone cut part 1: State-of-art technologies and common applicationsJ Oral Maxillofac Surg200866117782

22 

H Aro H Kallioniemi AJ Aho P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen Ultrasonic device in bone cutting. A histological and scanning electron microscopical studyActa Orthop Scand1981521510

23 

AM Mani PP Marawar S Amit A Dalvi Piezosurgery - A ReviewPravara Med Rev201461811

24 

E Agarwal SS Masamatti A Kumar Escalating Role of Piezosurgery in Dental TherapeuticsJ Clin Diagn Res2014810811

25 

S Nalbandian Piezosurgery techniques in implant dentistryAust Dent Pract201111626

26 

CA Lands S Stubinger K Laudemann J Rieger R Sader Bone harvesting at the anterior iliac crest using piezoosteotomy versus conventional open harvesting: a pilot studyOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod200810531928

27 

T Vercellotti Characteristics of Piezosurgery Surgical InstrumentsEssentials in piezosurgery: clinical advantages in dentistryQuintessence publishersItaly2009117

28 

AD Walmsley WR Laird AR Williams Dental plaque removal by cavitational activity during ultrasonic scalingJ Clin Periodontol198815953943

29 

S Hema K Kranti Z Sameer Piezosurgery in periodontology and oral implantologyJ Indian Soc Periodontol20091331556

30 

JA Sherman HT Davies Ultracision: the harmonic scalpel and its possible uses in maxillofacial surgeryBr J Oral Maxillofac Surg20003855302

31 

M Al-Dajani Recent trends in sinus lift surgery and their clinical implicationsClin Implant Dent Relat Res201418120412

32 

J Seoane J López-Niño L García-Caballero J M Seoane-Romero I Tomás P Varela Centelles Membrane perforation in sinus floor elevation - piezoelectric device versus conventional rotary instruments for osteotomy: an experimental studyClin Implant Dent Relat Res201315686773

33 

T Vercellotti S De Paoli M Nevins The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: introduction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmentation procedureInt J Periodontics Restorative Dent20012165617

34 

JP Van Den Bergh CM Ten Bruggenkate G Krekeler DB Tuinzing Sinusfloor elevation and grafting with autogenous iliac crest boneClin Oral Implants Res19989642935

35 

S Kasabah J Krug A Simůnek MC Lecaro Can we predict maxillary sinus mucosa perforation?Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove)20034611923

36 

S Stübinger A Stricker B I Berg Piezosurgery in implant dentistryClin Cosmet Investig Dent2015711524

37 

M Rahnama L Czupkałło L Czajkowski J Grasza J Wallner The use of piezosurgery as an alternative method of minimally invasive surgery in the authors’ experienceWideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne2013843216

38 

F Brugnami A Caiazzo P Mehra Piezosurgery-assisted, flapless split crest surgery for implant site preparationJ Maxillofac Oral Surg20141316772

39 

JG Rodriguez RM Eldibany Vertical splitting of the mandibular body as an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve lateralisationInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg201342910606

40 

R Eldibany JG Rodriguez Immediate loading of one-piece implants in conjunction with a modified technique of inferior alveolar nerve lateralisation: 10 years follow-upCraniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr.2014715562

41 

S Mouraret KS Houschyar DJ Hunter Cell viability after osteotomy and bone harvesting: comparison of piezoelectric surgery and conventional burInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg201443896671

42 

M Lakshmiganthan S Gokulanathan N Shanmugasundaram R Daniel S B Ramesh Piezosurgical osteotomy for harvesting intraoral block bone graftJ Pharm Bioallied Sci2012421658

43 

M Bovi Mobilization of the inferior alveolar nerve with simultaneous implant insertion: a new technique. Case reportInt J Periodontics Restorative Dent200525437583

44 

MC Metzger KH Bormann R Schoen NC Gellrich R Schmelzeisen Inferior alveolar nerve transposition - an in vitro comparison between piezosurgery and conventional bur useJ Oral Implantol20063211925

45 

S Stübinger C Landes O Seitz HF Zeilhofer R Sader Ultrasonic bone cutting in oral surgery: a review of 60 casesUltraschall Med20082916671



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 15-03-2024

Accepted : 08-04-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijpi.2024.007


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 820

PDF Downloaded: 212