Get Permission Vanitha, Vangala, Akshay Kumar K, Sutradhar, Sahithi, and Manjunatha: Socket preservation using gelatin hydrogel: A case report with radiographic analysis


Introduction

Post extraction Volumetric changes in the residual alveolar edge are constantly expected. Complex exodontic modalities might result in progressive alveolar bone loss.1 Botticelli et al. attributed that there will be a rapid rate of bone resorption in the buccal plate of alveolar bone in comparison with the lingual plate.2 Assuming that the conservation of the remaining alveolar ridge prevails at the hour of the tooth extraction helps unremarkable implant treatment.3 the long-term functional and esthetic stability of the implants necessitates vivacious sustenance of both hard & soft tissues.

Various grafting materials such as bovine bone matrix, hydroxyapatites (HAs), and bioglasses have been also introduced to forestall the breakdown of hard and delicate tissues encompassing the alveolar socket and balance out the blood supply.4 Although the utilization of autogenous bone graft to repair bone deformities is referenced as a brilliant norm, its sources are restricted, with additional complications such as bleeding, pain, and infection.3, 4

Scientists are still researching for reasonable bone elective materials to overcome the hurdles such as the absence of autogenous bone, surgical instruments, and restricted accessible bone volume. 9 Gelatin is a characteristic, biocompatible, biodegradable, and multi functional biopolymer. In the medico pharmaceutical field, gelatin is right now utilized as a grid for Implants, medicinal gadget coatings, and as a stabilizer in immunizations.5, 6

Gelatin has also proven its osteoconductive efficacy with radiographic and histologic evidence. The goal of this clinic-radiographic experiment is to assess enhanced socket sites utilizing gelatin gel using the radiographic and histological examination.

Case Report

Methods

Preparation of gelatin gel.5

Nippi, Inc. (MediGelatin®, HMG-BP, Tokyo, Japan) generously provided gelatin having an isoelectric point of 5.1. At 60°C, aqueous gelatin (5 wt%) was made by combining gelation granules and water. After the gelatin granules were completely dissolved in the water, glycerol (10 wt%) was added to the gelatin solution to promote gelation.

Surgical technique

Manual curettage was used to remove any soft tissue or inflammatory tissue in the extraction socket. Gentle compression was used to graft sticky gelatin gel into the socket. With a periosteal release incision, the wound was closed with a 3-0 silk suture (closed-membrane technique). After 4 months of healing, the full-thickness flap was raised to expose the augmented socket site and to prepare the osteotomy for implant placement. Following sequential drilling and wound closure using catgut 4-0 suture, the implant was inserted.

Class I extraction socket preservation with gelatin gel6

A 37-year-old male patient presented with a grade III mobility of about 16. The patient asked for a fixed implant-supported repair. The patient was healthy with the American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 (healthy patients or patients with controlled systematic diseases). All patients were informed and documented consent was obtained for a treatment procedure, radiographic analysis, and technique for restoration Atraumatic extraction was conducted under local anesthetic with 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine). Class, I extraction socket was found irt 16 (4-wall defect, intact bony housing, no wall involvement)(Figure 1) Gelatin gel was grafted and sutured on the defect (Figure 2, Figure 3). After 4 months of the healing period(Figure 4), the patient returned with an uneventful healing site.

Figure 1

Class I extraction socket irt 16 (4-wall defect, intact bony housing, no wall involvement)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/5ba705f6-fca8-483f-b371-ee284d132100image1.png
Figure 2

Gelatin gel was grafted

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/5ba705f6-fca8-483f-b371-ee284d132100image2.png
Figure 3

3-0 silk simple interrupted sutures placed

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/5ba705f6-fca8-483f-b371-ee284d132100image3.png
Figure 4

After 4 months of the healing period

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/5ba705f6-fca8-483f-b371-ee284d132100image4.png
Figure 5

Pre-op IOPA of 16

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/5ba705f6-fca8-483f-b371-ee284d132100image5.png
Figure 6

04 months post-op IOPA of 16

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/5ba705f6-fca8-483f-b371-ee284d132100image6.png

Results

Clinical findings

From a clinical perspective, the present case was healed uneventfully. The socket location resulted in satisfactory bone growth for implant implantation four months following the first graft using gelatin gel. With initial stability of more than 25 Ncm, favorable ridge augmentation was obtained for implant engagement.

Radiographic findings(Figure 5, Figure 6)

Intraoral periapical radiograph of 16 reveals a radio-opacity, postoperatively 4 months suggestive of new bone formation.

Discussion

Significant hard and soft tissue changes occur in alveolar bone after extraction7, 8 Overall resorption of the horizontal alveolar ridge has been reported by 50%.9 Preventing alveolar bone resorption after extraction is crucial to reduce the amount of bone augmentation that may be required during future implant therapy.

Socket preservation is a surgical treatment that aims to save alveolar bone following tooth extraction. To eliminate or minimize the need for bone augmentation during implant restorations.10 The alveolus preservation of the socket is a procedure that involves the usage of bone grafts or bone substitutes /with or without membranes.11 Bone graft materials used in periodontal and Oro maxillofacial surgery can be classified into autografts, allografts, alloplastic and xenografts.12

Autografts are strongly favored due to their osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity and osteogenicity.13 However, there are factors to consider such as limited availability or the need for a secondary donor site, graft resorption, and high cost.14 Other graft materials such as bovine bone, allogeneic or synthetic bone have been used as an alternative to bone augmentation. However, the materials are only osteoconductive and act as an anatomic framework for osteoblasts to lay down and form bone.

Gelatin and its analogs, mainly the hydrogels are getting a lot of attention. Shuai Yuan et al. attributed the positive results from nano gelatin hydrogel (NGH) & NGH + injectable platelet-rich fibrin in Ridge preservation with early angiogenesis and osteogenesis in an animal study.15

A study conducted by A. Leucht et al., with an all-gelatin-based toolbox of methacrylate-modified gelatin (GM), non-modified gelatin (G), and acetylated GM (GMA) exhibited the deposition of bone matrices associated proteins like collagen type I, fibronectin, and alkaline phosphatase within the 30-day culture. Suggestive of osteoinductive and conductive property of gelatin.16

As our case report is the denovo trial involving gelatin hydrogel as a bone substitute in the socket preservation technique, there are a few limitations are there in terms of sample size and advanced parameters like cone beam computed tomography for a better radiological assessment. Even the histological analysis of the bone structure would have been a great asset.

Conclusion

With all the aforementioned limitations I would suggest the gelatin hydrogel to consider as a bone substitute with an added advantage of affordability, fewer chances of rejection, and no secondary surgical site.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

R Horowitz D Holtzclaw P S Rosen A review on alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extractionJ Evid Based Dent Pract20121231496010.1016/S1532-3382(12)70029-5

2 

D Botticelli T Berglundh J Lindhe Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sitesJ Clin Periodontol20043110820810.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x

3 

M Nevins M Camelo S De Paoli B Friedland R K Schenk S P Benfenati A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent rootsInt J Periodontics Restor Dent20062611929

4 

P V Giannoudis H Dinopoulos E Tsiridis Bone substitutes: An updateInjury200536320710.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029

5 

K Noritake S Kuroda M Nyan Use of a gelatin hydrogel membrane containing β-tricalcium phosphate for guided bone regeneration enhances rapid bone formationDent Mater J20143356748010.4012/dmj.2014-123

6 

Y K Kim J K Ku Extraction socket preservationJ Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg20204664359

7 

L Schropp A Wenzel L Kostopoulos T Karring Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective studyInt J Periodontics Restor Dent200323431336

8 

J Pietrokovski M Massler Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extractionJ Prosthet Dent1967171218

9 

F Van Der Weijden F D Acqua, D E Slot Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: A systematic reviewJ Clin Periodontol2009361210485810.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x

10 

M Annunziata L Guida L Nastri A Piccirillo L Sommese C Napoli The role of autologous platelet concentrates in alveolar socket preservation: A systematic reviewTransfus Med Hemother2018453195203

11 

L Trombelli R Farina A Marzola L Bozzi B Liljenberg J Lindhe Modeling and remodeling of human extraction socketsJ Clin Periodontol2008357630910.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.x

12 

M R Urist B F Silverman K Büring F L Dubuc J M Rosenberg The bone induction principleClin Orthop Relat Res19675324383

13 

D H Whitman R L Berry D M Green Platelet gel: An autologous alternative to fibrin glue with applications in oral and maxillofacial surgeryJ Oral Maxillofac Surg199755111294130310.1016/s0278-2391(97)90187-7

14 

Y K Kim S G Kim J H Byeon H J Lee I U Um S C Lim Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod2010109449650310.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017

15 

S Yuan Q Li K Chen Ridge preservation applying a novel hydrogel for early angiogenesis and osteogenesis evaluation: an experimental study in canineJ Biol Eng202115119

16 

A Leucht A C Volz J Rogal Advanced gelatin-based vascularization bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting of vascularized bone equivalentsSci Rep2020105330



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 09-03-2022

Accepted : 13-04-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2022.016


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1573

PDF Downloaded: 246