Get Permission Umar M, Jananni M, Kumar R, and Pratebha B: Peri implantitis- A narrative review

Journal Information

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Innovative Publication

Journal ID (publisher-id): Innovative Publication

Journal ID (journal_submission_guidelines): https://www.innovativepublication.com/journal/IJPI

Title: IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology

ISSN: 2457-0087

Article Information

Copyright: 2021

Date received: 25 November 2021

Date accepted: 18 December 2021

Publication date: 5 February 2022

Volume: 6

Issue: 4

DOI: 10.18231/j.ijpi.2021.036

Peri implantitis- A narrative review

[] Umar M[1]

Email: umar12113@gmail.com

Designation:

Post Graduate Student

[] Jananni M[1]

Designation:

Reader

[] Saravana Kumar R[1]

Designation:

Professor & Head

[] Pratebha B[1]

Designation:

Professor

 

Dept. of Periodontology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University Puducherry India

Abstract

Dental implant therapy has become the prosthetic standard of care in modern comprehensive dental care. With increase in placement of dental implants, increase in prevalence of peri-implant diseases have also been reported. Two entities are described within the concept of peri-implant diseases; peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Various etiological factors are responsible for the occurrence of peri-implantitis with bacterial biofilm playing the major role. Appropriate diagnosis and timely management of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis is essential to prevent the implant loss. Variety of treatment modalities are available for management of peri-implantitis which can eliminate the disease progression and enable the restoration of optimal implant function. This narrative review provides insight of the prevalence, etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of peri-implantitis with emphasis on current evidence.

Introduction

Dental implant therapy has become the prosthetic standard of care in modern comprehensive dental care. With increase in placement of dental implants, increase in prevalence of peri-implant diseases have also been reported. 1 Two entities are described within the concept of peri-implant diseases; peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Peri-implant mucositis is the reversible inflammation in the soft tissue surrounding implants. Peri-implantitis is an irreversible inflammatory reaction involving the underlying supporting bone. 2

The bacteria from dental biofilms are considered as the major etiological factor for peri-implant disease. The associated risk factors for peri-implant diseases are alteration in the balance of host-parasite interaction, cigarette smoking, oral hygiene and history of periodontitis. 3 The other possible factors such as genetic traits and implant surface are under investigation. Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans are some of the bacterial species responsible for peri-implant disease. The prosthetic design is also considered as risk factor when the prosthesis obstructs the patient or the dental professional in daily hygiene measures or gaining access to the implant surface. 4

Peri-implantitis is classified based on severity of the disease as Early, Moderate and Advanced. Different methods have been used to assess peri-implant tissue health and to diagnose these disease entities. 3 The diagnostic methods include evaluation of peri-implant microbiota, peri-implant probing, analyses of peri-implant crevicular fluid or saliva and radiographic evaluation of peri-implant bone loss. The treatment modality includes two types: surgical therapy and non-surgical therapy. Mechanical debridement of the implant surface is the commonest treatment employed for peri-implant diseases.

This article will provide an overview of prevalence, classification, etiology, clinical features, management and maintenance therapy of peri-implantitis with emphasis on current evidence.

Peri-Implantitis

Peri-implantitis is an implant related disease condition which contributes to significant proposition of implant failure. This condition was first described Levignac in 1965. 5 The term peri-implantitis was coined by Mombelli 6 in 1987 who described the disease as equivalent to chronic periodontitis.

According to Frank Schwarz 2017, Peri-implantitis is a pathological condition occurring in tissues around dental implants, characterized by inflammation in the peri- implant mucosa and progressive loss of supporting bone.

Prevalence

Prevalence of peri-implantitis has been reported by various authors and they greatly differ based on number of implants & follow up

Table 1

Prevalence ofperi-implantitis

Author

Follow up

Number of implants

Prevalence (%)

Derks et al (2015) 7

-

-

42.9%

Aguirre –Zozrano et al (2015) 8

5.3 years

786

16%

Daubert et al (2015) 9

10.9 years

225

16%

Konstantinidis et al (2015) 10

5.5 years

597

6.2%

Derks et al (2016) 11

9 years

2277

24.9%

Monje et al (2017) 12

3.9 years

206

7.3%

Schwartz et al (2017) 13

-

512

7.6%

Tenenbaum et al (2017) 14

10.8 years

108

12%

Papaspyridakos et al (2018) 15

5.2 years

457

10%

Katafuchi et al (2018) 16

10.9 years

168

16.7%

Cosgarea et al (2019) 17

9 years

-

45%

Francetti et al (2019) 18

5 years

384

4.6%

French et al (2019) 19

6.7 years

4591

3.6%

Kerbs et al (2019) 20

17 to 23 years

274

15%

C lassification of P eri-Implantitis

Numerous classification systems have been proposed in literature for peri-implantitis. However there is no universally accepted classification so far. The following are the classification systems for peri-implantitis:

  1. Froum and Rosen, 2012classified peri-implantitis based on distinct clinical stages as follows,21

  2. Bogaerde et al 2014 proposed classification of bone defects adjacent to dental implants highlighting the defect anatomy in the progression of the regenerative process22.

    1. Closed defects- It is characterized by the maintenance of intact surrounding bone walls

    2. Open defects- It is the one which lack one or more bone walls.

  3. Ata-Ali et al (2015)classified peri-implantitis based on the clinical status.23

  4. Sarmiento et al (2016)classified peri-implantitis based on etiology.24

  5. Passi D et al (2016)classified peri-implantitis based on bleeding on probing, probing depth, percentage of bone loss and mobility.25

  6. According to Rucha Shah et al (2016), Retrograde Peri-implantitis is classified as,26

  7. According to Sarmast et al 2017, retrograde peri-implantitis is classified as,27

Table 2

Classification ofperi-implantitis by Froum and Rosen

Early

PD ≥ 4 mm (bleeding and/or suppuration on probing) Bone loss < 25% of the implant length

Moderate

PD ≥ 6 mm (bleeding and/or suppuration on probing) Bone loss 25% to 50% of the implant length

Advanced

PD ≥ 8 mm (bleeding and/or suppuration on probing) Bone loss > 50% of the implant length

[i] PD-Probing Depth

Table 3

Classification ofperi-implantitis by Ata-Ali

Staging

Definition

Stage I

BoP and/or SUP and bone loss ≤ 3 mm beyond biological bone remodeling

Stage II

BoP and/or SUP and bone loss > 3 mm and < 5 mm beyond biological bone remodeling

Stage III

BoP and/or SUP and bone loss ≥5 mm beyond biological bone remodeling

Stage IV

BoP and/or SUP and bone loss ≥50% of the implant length beyond biological bone remodeling

[i] BoP- Bleeding on Probing; SUP- Suppuration

Table 4

Classification ofperi-implantitis based on etiology

Origin

Example

Peri-implantitis induced by pathogenic bacteria/biofilm

Plaque, calculus, biofilm, previous host susceptibility to periodontitis (previous/active)

Peri-implantitis induced by exogenous irritants

Residual cement, smoking, impacted food debris

Peri-implantitis induced by iatrogenic factors

Buccal implant placement, inadequate inter-implant distance, overheating during surgical placement, poorly fitting restorations

Peri-implantitis induced by extrinsic pathology

Proximal periapical pathology, proximal carcinoma, latent endodontic lesion post extraction

Peri-implantitis induced by absence of keratinized tissue (AKT)

Absence of attached gingival, lack of keratinized tissue with or without muscle attachment
Table 5

Classification ofperi-implantitis by Passi D

Stage

Bleeding on probing

Probing depth

Bone loss (%) of implant length

Mobility

Proposed treatment and prognosis

Stage 1

-

2-3mm

10-25%

No mobility

No treatment. Oral hygienic instructions; Prognosis is good

Stage 2

+

4-6mm

25-50%

Grade 1

Vertical defect <2-4mm

Vertical

Guided bone regeneration, osteoplasty

Horizontal

Horizontal defect< half of implant height Apically positioned flap, Guided bone regeneration, osteoplasty

Combination

Combination defect Bone augmentation & Guided bone regeneration Prognosis is fair

Stage 3

+

6-8mm

>50%

Grade 2

Vertical defect 2-4mm

Vertical

Guided bone regeneration Autogenous bone wedge grafting

Horizontal

Horizontal defect> half of implant height Guided bone regeneration and augmentation

Combination

Combination defect Implant removal Questionable prognosis

Stage 4

+

>8mm

>50%

Grade 3

Implant removal Poor prognosis
Table 6

Classification of retrogradeperi-implantitis by Rucha Shah

Class I (Mild)

Extends < 25% of the implant length from implant apex.

Class II (Moderate)

Extends 25–50% of the implant length from implant apex.

Class III (Advanced)

>50% of the implant length from implant apex.

Table 7

Classification of retrogradeperi-implantitis by Sarmast

Class 1

Implant placement resulting in devitalization of adjacent previously vital tooth

Class 2

Implant apex infected by persistent periapical lesion on adjacent tooth/implant

Class 3

Implant apex placed/angulated labially or lingually outside envelope of bone

Class 4

Implant apex lesion developed due to residual infection at placement site

Classification based on defect morphology

  1. Nishimura et al, 1997 gave another system of classification exists amount of bone loss with shaped of defect associated 28

    1. Class 1: Slight horizontal bone loss with minimal peri-implant defects

    2. Class 2: Moderate horizontal bone loss with isolated vertical defects

    3. Class 3: Moderate to advanced horizontal bone loss with broad, circular bony defects.

    4. Class 4: Advanced horizontal bone loss with broad, circumferential vertical defects, as well as loss of the oral and/or vestibular bony wall

  2. Schwarz et al 2019 29 classified peri implant defect depending on the configuration of the bony defect as:

    1. Class I defect – Intraosseous

    2. Class II defect – Supra-alveolar in the crestal implant insertion area.

  3. Spiekermann 30 1984 characterized peri-implant defect into the type of bone resorption pattern into 5 category.

    1. Class I – Horizontal,

    2. Class II – Hey-shaped

    3. Class III a – Funnel shaped

    4. Class III b – Gap-like

    5. Class IV – Horizontal-circular form

Etiology of peri –implantitis

Though peri-implantitis, like periodontitis is considered a multifactorial disease, two major etiological factors are:

  1. Bacterial infection

  2. Excessive mechanical stress

Bacterial infection- Role of plaque microbiota

Dental plaque or biofilm describes a structure of highly organized microbial community in a well-defined matrix which is adherent to hard surfaces of the oral cavity. A cause- effect relationship between biofilm formation and peri-implant diseases have been demonstrated in humans. 31

Peri-implantitis present with the mixed and variable microbial pattern, although predominated by gram-negative bacteria.27 Microbiota associated with failing dental implants is similar to flora commonly associated with periodontally involved teeth. The microorganisms most commonly related to the failure of an implant are rods and motile forms of gram negative anaerobes and spirochetes. These includes: Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis(PG), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans(AA), Bacteroides forsythus, Treponema denticola(TD), Prevotella nigrescens, Peptostreptococcus micros and Fusobacterium nucleatum.32, 33 Some studies have reported that the microbiota of peri-implant cases is different from those periodontal disease. Those studies have detected high numbers of peptostreptococcus and staphylococci species.

The bacterial species of peri-implantitis cases vary between partially and fully edentulous subjects.

Samples from partial edentulous patients have greater gram-negative aerobic species when compared to completely edentulous cases. 34 Periodontal pathogens Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (AA), Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG) and Treponema denticola (TD) where more commonly reported in partially edentulous cases than completely edentulous cases. 35, 36

Longitudinal studies have found an increase in a number of colony forming units of bacteria, slight additional increase in pathogenic species and increase in proportion of motile organisms especially spirochetes as severity of disease progresses.

Excessive mechanical stress

It has been postulated that mechanical overloading a contributing factor for peri-implant bone loss and late implant failure. Occlusal overload is influenced by prosthetic design. Implants subjected to occlusal overload results in micro motion at the implant abutment interface and compromises the osseointegration during early healing. 34 The location of implant, the dimension of the implant, proportion of the prosthesis are some of the factors leading to occlusal overload. The occlusal overload also depends on the magnitude, duration, transmitted as lateral or axial stress on to the bone. 34This creates micro fractures of the bone around the implant and initiate peri-implant crestal bone loss which will further propagate in the presence of microbial plaque. 37

The excess occlusal can be a consequence of placement of implant in poor quality bone, Placement of an implant in poor quality bone, Placement of an implant is an unfavorable position that does not favor ideal load transmission over implant surface, The patient has a pattern of heavy occlusal function associated with para functional habits, Improper prosthetic superstructure that does not fit the implant precisely. 38

In specific occlusal overload conditions like bruxism, the habit often results in fracture of the suprastructure, but never affects the marginal bone around implants.

Clinical Features

Peri-implantitis is the inflammation of soft tissue around the implant with loss of supporting bone. It corresponds to periodontitis around natural teeth. Early signs of peri-implantitis include increase in GCF production and bleeding on probing. 39 Two important features that differentiates peri-implantitis from peri-implant mucositis are the presence of peri-implant pocket and attachment loss. Additional clinical features are redness of the tissue, swelling of the tissue, suppuration and mucosal enlargement. 40

Other important features late stage peri-implantitis are implant mobility and pain on function. The classical feature of peri-implantitis is bone loss. Although large variation exist regarding the amount of bone required to define a case. 8th European workshop of periodontology in 2012 reported that > 2mm bone loss from the expected marginal level is considered as case definition. 41

Guidelines for diagnosing peri-implantitis

Figure 1

Guidelines for diagnosing peri-implantitis 42

PBL- Pathological bone loss; RBL- Rate of bone loss

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/afed6030-c792-41e8-8ed3-61fa572cd18bimage1.png

Management

Based upon the clinical and radiographic diagnosis, certain protocols for preventive and interceptive therapeutic measures have been proposed for implants diagnosed with peri implantitis. Lang et al (2004) reported that the system of supportive therapy is cumulative and consists of few steps. The major clinical parameters used are Presence of biofilm, Presence or absence of bleeding on probing (BOP), Presence or absence of suppuration, increased peri-implant Probing depth and evidence and extent of radiographic alveolar bone loss.

Oral implants without plaque and calculus with healthy peri-implant tissue there may be absence of BOP, suppuration, Probing depth should not exceed greater than 3mm to be considered as clinically stable and these sites should not be exposed to therapeutic measures. The indications of appropriate treatment for the management of peri-implantitis lead to the development of treatment protocols.

CIST (Cumulative Interceptive Supportive Therapy) Protocol by Mombelli and Lang(1998) 43

Figure 2

CIST ProtocolPPD- Probing Pocket Depth; BOP- Bleeding on Probing; CHX- Chlorhexidine; pos- Positive; neg- Negative

PPD- Probing Pocket Depth; BOP- Bleeding on Probing; CHX- Chlorhexidine; pos- Positive; neg- Negative

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/afed6030-c792-41e8-8ed3-61fa572cd18bimage2.png

Table 8

AKUT protocol

Stage

Result

Therapy

PD<3mm, no plaque or BOP

No therapy

A

PD<3 mm, plaque and/or BOP

Mechanical cleaning, polishing

B

PD 4-5 mm, no radiographic bone loss

Mechanical cleaning, polishing, OHI + local antiinfective therapy

C

PD> 5mm, radiographic bone loss <2 mm

Mechanical cleaning, polishing, microbiological test, local and systemic anti&#8209;infective therapy

D

PD > 5 mm, radiographic bone loss >2 mm

Resective or regenerative surgery

[i] PD- Probong Depth; BOP- Bleeding on Probing; OHI- Oral hygiene instructions

Maintenance Program

Maintenance therapy after implant placement is of utmost important for effective functioning of implants without any disease. It is classified into two categories.

  1. At home implant care

  2. Professional hygiene care 44

Table 9

Aids for implant maintenance

At home implant care

Professional hygiene care

Brushing

Scaling and curettage

Soft manual tooth brush

Plastic instruments

Motorized tooth brush

Plastic instruments reinforced with graphites

Sonic tooth brush

Gold-plated curette

End tufted brush

Ultrasonic or sonic scalers covered with plastic sleeve

Interproximal cleaning/circumferential cleaning

Polishing

Floss, foam tips, Disposable wooden picks, Interproximal cleaners

Rubber cup with non-abrasive polishing paste E.g.: aluminum oxide, low abrasive dentifrice

Locally applied therapeutics

Locally applied therapeutics

Chlorhexidine digluconate

Arestin, Periochip, Atridox

Water irrigation

Subgingival irrigation

Hydro floss

Antiseptic agents such as peroxide, chlorhexidine using a plastic irrigation tip.

Summary and Conclusion

Use of dental implants for replacement of missing teeth has become the norm in oral rehabilitation in recent days. Though implants have shown effective and predictable results, increase in use of dental implants has also been associated with occurrence of implant failures of which the most common cause is peri-implantitis. Peri-implantitis is progressive destructive chronic diseases of bacterial or mechanical origin that affects hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant.

The purpose of this paper is to review and report the available evidence for various aspect of peri-implantitis; prevalence, etiology, pathogenesis, management and maintenance.

On analyzing the literature for prevalence of peri-implantitis, the prevalence of peri-implantitis at implant level ranged between 6.5% -47% and prevalence at patient level ranged between 18.8% - 47%.

Looking at etiology, dental plaque and associated micro-organisms has been universally identified as the primary etiologic agents. The second factor identified as etiology is the mechanical factors. Apart from these, a number of risk factors have been associated with peri-implant diseases like local factors (parafunctional habit, local anatomic factors, etc.), systemic factors (age, genetics, medical conditions, etc.), behavioral factors (oral hygiene maintenance, patient compliance).

On analyzing the effects of systemic diseases on periodontitis diabetes was the most commonly investigated risk factor. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes were found to be at a higher risk peri-implantitis when compared to controlled diabetes and healthy sites.

On analyzing the evidence for microbiologic profile of peri-implantitis, conflicting results have been reported, but the following micro-organisms were more prevalent Porphyromonas gingivalis (PG), Prevotella intermedia, Treponema denticola (TD), Tannerella forsythia, staphylococcus species, Epstein-Barr virus and human cytomegalo virus 2.

On analyzing the diagnostic evidence of peri-implantitis numerous studies have reported the effects of peri-implantitis on inflammatory cytokines. According to evidence IL1β and TNFα were the most studied pro-inflammatory cytokines. The levels of theses cytokines were found to be significantly higher in peri-implantitis sites when compared to healthy sites. Other cytokines like IL-7, IL-6 and IL-10 have also been investigated but strong association have not been reported.

Looking into treatment of peri-implantitis both non-surgical and surgical interventions have been analyzed. Non-surgical therapy included alteration of implant surface, soft tissue debridement and adjunctive use of anti-microbial, lasers and host modulatory agents. Non-surgical therapy is effective only in eliminating the local etiologic factors and might not the effective in osseous defects. Surgical interventions include reflection of flap, debridement and use of various bone grafts material and membranes. Surgical approach with placement of bone grafts in combination with GTR membranes have been proven to be most effective treatment option with long term predictable result.

With increase in awareness and demand for replacement of missing teeth with dental implants, peri-implant diseases are also increased. Therefore, understanding the etiology, pathogenesis and strategies for treatment for the same should be given equal importance.

Source of Funding

This work not supported in any foundation.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest concerning the authorship and publication of this article.

References

1 

R Shah T Raison A B Tarun Kumar S M Dhoom A radiographic classification of retrograde periimplantitisJ Contemp Dent Pract201617431321

2 

N D Sarmast H H Wang A S Sajadi N Angelov S O Dorn Classification and clinical management of retrograde peri-implantitis associated with apical periodontitis: a proposed classification system and case reportJ Endod2017431119214

3 

D Passi M Singh S R Dutta S Sharma M Atri J Ahlawat Newer proposed classification of periimplant defects: A critical updateJ Oral Biol Craniofac Res2017715861

4 

J P Fiorellini A classification system for peri-implant diseases and conditionsInt J Periodontics Restorative Dent2016365699705

5 

J Ata-Ali F Ata-Ali L Bagan A classification proposal for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a critical updateOpen Dent J20159393510.2174/1874210601509010393

6 

L V Bogaerde A proposal for the classification of bony defects adjacent to dental implantsInt J Periodontics Restor Dent20042426471

7 

F Stuart F Paul A proposed classification for peri-implantitisInt J Periodontics Restorative Dent20123253340

8 

E Figuero F Graziani I Sanz D Herrera M Sanz Management of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitisPeriodontology200066125573

9 

T Berglundh L Persson B Klinge A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 yearsJ Clin Periodontol2002197212

10 

J Lindhe J Meyle Peri-implant diseases: consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on PeriodontologyJ Clin Periodontol20083582825

11 

E S Karring A Stavropoulos B Ellegaard T Karring Treatment of peri-implantitis by the Vector systemClin Oral Implants Res20051628893

12 

A Mombelli M A Van Oosten E Schürch Jr N P Lang The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implantsOral Microbiol Immunol19872414551

13 

G C Costa M Aras V Chitre Failure in dental implantsAdv Dentl Med Sci201426881

14 

D French H M Grandin R Ofec Retrospective cohort study of 4,591 dental implants: Analysis of risk indicators for bone loss and prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitisJ Periodontol2019907691700

15 

M Krebs N Kesar A Begić N Von Krockow G H Nentwig P Weigl Incidence and prevalence of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis 17 to 23 (18.9) years postimplant placementClin Implant Dent Related Res2019216111623

16 

J Derks D Schaller J Håkansson J L Wennström C Tomasi T Berglundh Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: prevalence of Peri-implantitisJ Dent Res2016951439

17 

I K Konstantinidis G A Kotsakis S Gerdes M H Walter Cross-sectional study on the prevalence and risk indicators of peri-implant diseasesEur J Oral Implantol2015817588

18 

D M Daubert B F Weinstein S Bordin B G Leroux T F Flemming Prevalence and predictive factors for peri-implant disease and implant failure: a cross-sectional analysisJ Periodontol201586333747

19 

L A Aguirre-Zorzano R Estefanía-Fresco O Telletxea M Bravo Prevalence of peri-implant inflammatory disease in patients with a history of periodontal disease who receive supportive periodontal therapyClin Oral Implants Res20152611133844

20 

J Derks D Schaller J Håkansson J L Wennström C Tomasi T Berglundh Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: prevalence of peri-implantitisJ Dent Res2016951439

21 

H Tenenbaum O Bogen F Séverac R Elkaim J L Davideau O Huck Long-term prospective cohort study on dental implants: clinical and microbiological parametersClin Oral Implants Res20172818694

22 

A Monje H L Wang J Nart Association of preventive maintenance therapy compliance and peri-implant diseases: a cross-sectional studyJ Periodontol20178810103041

23 

P Papaspyridakos T Barizan Bordin Y J Kim C Defuria S E Pagni K Chochlidakis Implant survival rates and biologic complications with implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses: A retrospective study with up to 12-year follow-upClin Oral Implants Res201829888193

24 

M Katafuchi B F Weinstein B G Leroux Y W Chen D M Daubert Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional radiographic analysisJ Clin Periodontol201845222532

25 

R Cosgarea A Sculean J A Shibli G E Salvi Prevalence of peri-implant diseases-a critical review on the current evidenceBraz Oral Res2019331e06310.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0063

26 

L Francetti N Cavalli S Taschieri S Corbella Ten years follow-up retrospective study on implant survival rates and prevalence of peri-implantitis in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitationsClin Oral Implants Res201930325260

27 

F Schwarz K Becker N Sahm T Horstkemper K Rousi J Becker The prevalence of peri-implant diseases for two-piece implants with an internal tube-in-tube connection: a cross-sectional analysis of 512 implantsClin Oral Implants Res20172812432

28 

K Nishimura T Itoh K Takaki R Hosokawa T Natio M Yokota Periodontal parameters of osseointegrated dental implants. A 4-year controlled follow-up studyClin Oral Implants Res199782728

29 

A Monje R Pons A Insua J Nart H L Wang F Schwarz Morphology and severity of peri-implantitis bone defectsClin Implant Dent Related Res201921463543

30 

S Kühl S Zürcher N U Zitzmann A Filippi M Payer D Dagassan-Berndt Detection of peri-implant bone defects with different radiographic techniques-a human cadaver studyClin Oral Implants Res201627552934

31 

R Pontoriero M P Tonelli G Carnevale A Mombelli S R Nyman N P Lang Experimentally induced peri-implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans Clin Oral Implants Res1994542549

32 

G Charalampakis Å Leonhardt P Rabe G Dahlén Clinical and microbiological characteristics of peri-implantitis cases: A retrospective multicentre studyClin Oral Implants Res2012239104554

33 

M M Fürst G E Salvi N P Lang G R Persson Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implantsClin Oral Implants Res2007185018

34 

A Mombelli N P Lang Microbial aspects of implant dentistry 2000Periodontology199447480

35 

M Kocar K Seme N I Hren Characterization of the normal bacterial flora in peri-implant sulci of partially and completely edentulous patientsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants20102546908

36 

J Karbach A Callaway Y D Kwon B Hoedt B Al-Nawas Comparison of five parameters as risk factors for peri-mucositisInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants20092434917

37 

J Lindhe J Meyle Peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of the Sixth European Workshop on PeriodontologyJ Clin Periodontol20083582827

38 

N Soldatos G E Romanos M Michaiel A Sajadi N Angelov R Weltman Management of retrograde peri-implantitis using an air-abrasive device, Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and guided bone regenerationCase Rep Dent2018

39 

L J Heitz-Mayfield Peri-implant diseases: Diagnosis and risk indicatorsJ. Clin. Periodontol20083529230410.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01275.x

40 

S Tecco M G Grusovin S Sciara F Bova G Pantaleo P Capparé The association between three attitude-related indexes of oral hygiene and secondary implant failures: A retrospective longitudinal studyInt J Dent Hyg201816372910.1111/idh.12300

41 

M Sanz I L Chapple Working Group 4 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology Clinical research on peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of Working Group 4J Clin Periodontol20123912202610.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01837.x

42 

A Ramanauskaite G Juodzbalys Diagnostic Principles of Peri-Implantitis: a Systematic Review and Guidelines for Peri-Implantitis Diagnosis ProposalJ Oral Maxillofac Res200973e810.5037/jomr.2016.7308

43 

A Mombelli N P Lang The diagnosis and treatment of peri&#8209;implantitisPeriodontol199817638209

44 

G Schenk T F Flemmig T Betz J Reuther B Klaiber Some clinical and radiographical features of submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. A 5-year follow-up studyClin Oral Implants Res19978542733

Keywords

Categories:

Subject: Review Article

Keywords:

Keywords

Peri­implantitis

Implant

Peri­Implant mucositis

Laser

Regeneration

Prevalence

jats-html.xsl

×

Table details

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 25-11-2021

Accepted : 18-12-2021


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijpi.2021.036


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 4195

PDF Downloaded: 632




Sitemap | Editorial and Ethical Policies | Open Access | Advertise | Feedback | Disclaimer
©2016 Ip International Journal Of Periodontology And Implantology | Published by IP Innovative Publication Pvt. Ltd. (www.ipinnovative.com)
Online since 22nd July, 2016
IJPI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.